Eye of the Tiger
Stop the presses! The Pirates lost a one-run game tonight, 7-6, to the Detroit Tigers, the team with the best record in the overwhelmingly best league in baseball, the so-called Junior Circuit, the American League.
Enough with the surpassingly bad record of the Pirates in one-run games. Who cares? They are 27 games under .500 at the halfway point, which projects to 108 losses, in case anyone cares, and it is unclear that anyone does. One-run losses or ten-run losses, it all amounts to a crap team. As Bill Parcells, a realist from another sport is fond of saying, you are what your record says you are.
Besides, the pattern is nearly always the same, and tonight's loss was no exception. Bad pitching (Kip Wells gave up all seven runs, lasted only into the third and ballooned his ERA to a ridiculous 15.09 -- why isn't Oliver Perez and his sensational 6.63 ERA at least in the bullpen instead of waiting to toil away in Naptown?), a late rally, followed by a closeout by a bad closer, Todd Jones, he of the 6+ ERA).
The Pirates can gaze on the Tigers and wonder what it takes to succeed. Here is a franchise that has, like the Buccos, been mired in mediocrity for well over a decade. Last post-season appearance? 1987, five years farther back than our heroes. Hitting? Not that great. Close to three times as many strikeouts (598) as walks (214) and 11 players with on-base percentages below the pedestrian level of .330.
The differences between the two teams? Well, let's leave aside managing. The last manager to take the Pirates to the post-season, Jim Leyland, now manages the Tigers. When asked about his decision to join the Tigers, when the Pirates were looking for a manager, Leyland replied that he felt the Pirates were going in a different direction. The Pirates hired on Resident Genius (RG) Jim Tracy, who has never stopped reminding all of us of his one post-season trip in five years with the Dodgers, who outspent the Tigers and the Pirates combined during those years.
But let's forget all that and the numerous delicious ironies of Leyland's hirings of ex-Pirates, including Lloyd McClendon, dispatched by the Pirates front office for his handling of an underachieving team that couldn't win one-run games. Whew! Sure glad RG has taken care of all that!
Oh, yes. We're going to forget on-the-field "leadership." OK, let's look at pitching. Surely, therein lies the success of the Tigers. Strikeouts, going into tonight's game: 496. Walks: 231. Hits allowed: 644. The Pirates staff: Strikeouts: 522. Walks: 304. Hits allowed: 791. That is 22o additional baserunners for the Pirates staff, or nearly three per game. Now take three late-inning contributors for the Tigers and the gaudy numbers of their starters become clear: Jamie Walker, Joel Zumaya and Fernando Rodney: 104 strikeouts, 40 walks.
Of course, those numbers don't tell the whole story, because extra baserunners change the complexion of the game and the strategy of each at-bat. The Post Gazette recently ran a well-argued article on the poor fielding of the Pirates, particularly at second base (Jose Castillo), but that doesn't account for an average of four walks per game. It also doesn't account for the relentless record of bad early innings by Zach Duke. Is the fielding bad in the early innings, only to recover later, as Duke's pattern seems to be? And conversely, do the early-inning successes and later-inning collapses of Ian Snell all fall on the doorstep of the defense?
Part of the problem for the Pirates lately, of course, is that the AL is just plain better than the NL. But then that might be easier to accept had the team not lost three straight to the worst team in the AL, the Kansas City Royals. It's hard to reach any conclusion other than that the Pirates are the worst of the worst.
So for this July 4 weekend, Pirates fans, fire up a Worsewurst.
